The dark underbelly of America contains numerous warts, boils, and cancerous tumors, inflicted by that loathsome grimoire of madness that the elected leaders of our nation have become.


Well, I'm FedUp and I'm not taking it any more
!

Saturday, April 5, 2008

The Vice President

It may or may not be a bit premature to look at possible running mates for the democratic candidates for president, but I've compiled a list of the possible choices facing Obama and Clinton.

Barack Obama:

Delaware Senator Joe Biden

Pro: He has a long record on national security and foreign policy and is a member of a key demographic group—Catholics. His attacks on Rudy Giuliani proved he can be an affable attack dog, a rare skill.

Con: Gaffe-prone and perhaps too fond of the klieg lights. He’s not accustomed to being anybody's
number two. Besides, he already has a good job.

New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson

Pro: He carries Cabinet-level and national security experience. As the governor of a battleground state and a member of key demographic group—Hispanics—Richardson brings much to the ticket. Then there is his important recent endorsement, delivered at a crucial time.

Con: Prone to sloppy speech. At times, he’s been a weak debater. And questions about his '04 "vetting" remain.

New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg

Pro: Executive and private sector experience. As a former Republican, he might make the ticket appear more ideologically balanced. Best of all, he brings infinite resources.

Con: Very liberal on social issues. Paired with Obama, he creates the Archie Bunker nightmare ticket: African-American and Jew. Obama doesn't need
the money.

Former Indiana Rep. Tim Roemer

Pro: A former six-term House member, he served on the 9/11 Commission. Pro-life.

Con: Pro-life.

Former Georgia Senator Sam Nunn

Pro: He has a solid national security record and a reputation as a moderate who can work across the aisle. Also, he’s a Southerner with gravitas.

Con: He's 70 and disliked by gay rights groups.

Virginia Governor Tim Kaine

Pro: He is comfortable talking about faith and has youth and energy on his side. An early Obama backer from a battleground state.

Con: Looks even younger than he is. No national security experience.

Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano

Pro: Executive experience and a proven statewide winner. A Westerner from McCain's home state, she could boost the ticket there.

Con: No national security experience.

Retired General Colin Powell

Pro: National security credentials.

Con: Backed and promoted Iraq war.

Former Virginia Governor Mark Warner

Pro: Private sector and executive experience in a key state. Shares Obama's message of change and has won votes in rural areas.

Con: Currently running for Senate. No national security experience.

Virginia Senator Jim Webb

Pro: A decorated war veteran and former Republican from a key state, he looks perfect on paper.

Con: Blunt and unpredictable, he might be a reluctant campaigner.

Former South Dakota Senator Tom Daschle

Pro: A key Obama advisor from the start of his campaign, he is a veteran Washington insider who knows how to win in a red state environment.

Con: He is a veteran Washington insider who is now a lobbyist. Not cut out to be an attack dog.

New York Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton

Pro: Smart, tough, vetted. Could bring her own alienated supporters back to Obama and unite the party.

Con: As divisive a pol as exists in American politics. There is bad blood between the candidates, in no small part because she has suggested Obama is unready to lead.


Hillary Rodham Clinton:

Ohio Governor Ted Strickland

Pro: A popular figure in a key state, he helped deliver Ohio for Clinton. His Christian ministerial background could bridge God gap for Democrats.

Con: No national security experience.

Former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack

Pro: A Midwesterner with a compelling personal story.

Con: Not an electric speaker. Might not be able to deliver Iowa.

Indiana Senator Evan Bayh

Pro: VP from central casting. He can point to executive and foreign policy experience.

Con: Indiana’s not a swing state. He’s a bit bland, not to mention inexperienced as an attack dog.

Illinois Senator Barack Obama

Pro: Could bring young and African-American backers, who are angry at Clinton, back into the fold. Popular with independents.

Con: They've said nasty things about each other. Any path to the nomination runs right through him.

Florida Senator Bill Nelson

Pro: A folksy moderate from a key electoral battleground.

Con: Not well-known outside his home state, which isn't well-regarded nationally after recent election debacles.

Retired General Wes Clark

Pro: Military experience. A tireless campaigner for Clinton who is familiar with the rigors of the presidential campaign trail.

Con: Ran a rocky 2004 campaign.

Hey, here's something rather interesting. Another possible choice for Hillary's VP could be Bill Clinton. There is no laws that I know that would prevent this from happening. Better yet, Obama and Bill as the democratic tag team.

Yeah right.

No comments:


Liberals got women the right to vote.

Liberals got African-Americans the right to vote.

Liberals created Social Security and lifted millions of elderly people out of poverty.

Liberals ended segregation.

Liberals passed the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act.

Liberals created Medicare.

Liberals passed the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act.

What did the ignorant conservatives do?

They opposed them on every one of those things.

Every damn one!

So when you try to hurl that label at my feet, 'Liberal,' as if it were something to be ashamed of, something dirty, something to run away from, it won't work because I will pick up that label and I will wear it as a badge of honor.